ArticleArXiv2026
Assessing Hemodynamic Impact of Tissue-Engineered Vascular Graft Displacement: Combining Postoperative in vivo Results and Computational Modeling to Improve Surgical Planning.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVG) have shown promise in advancing vascular reconstructions. However, precise in vivo implantation is challenging, and it is unclear how deviations in location and size affect hemodynamics. This study aims to 1) compare preoperative designs and postoperative anatomies of TEVG in an in vivo study to evaluate discrepancies and 2) investigate the impact of graft displacement and size on hemodynamics by virtually simulating implantation scenarios that are informed by in vivo postoperative results. Methods: Designed and postoperative geometries of four porcine aortas were compared to measure the mismatch in implantation location and graft shape. These results informed a virtual TEVG implantation study. TEVG location, orientation, and size were varied to investigate the effects on the final aorta shape and hemodynamics. Anastomosis of TEVG was simulated using finite element modeling. Key hemodynamic metrics were obtained from virtual implantations and actual postoperative anatomies using computational fluid dynamics. Results: Our in vivo study showed that TEVGs can experience up to 6.9 mm displacement and a 38° rotational shift post-implantation, leading to discrepancies in pressure drop (2.5 mmHg, 50%) and time-averaged wall shear stress (7.2 Pa, 72%) compared to predictions. Virtual TEVG implantation showed that peak systolic pressure drop (PSPD) was most sensitive to translation in the inferior-superior direction and rotation about the anterior-posterior axis. Size mismatch had a greater impact on time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) (85%) than PSPD (23%). Additionally, virtual anastomosis simulations improved aortic shape predictions by 27.5%. Conclusion: Our results highlight the sensitivity of key hemodynamic metrics to graft implantation location and size mismatch. By quantifying displacement ranges and their impacts during surgery, surgeons can make informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41822152PMC12976936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.