Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822140›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Dissecting the Sublexical Route for Reading: Frontal and Parietal Networks Support Learned Orthography-to-Phonology Mappings.

Sara M Dyslin, Andrew T DeMarco, Ryan Staples, J Vivian Dickens, Sarah F Snider, Rhonda Friedman, Peter E Turkeltaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lesions Reveal Shared and Distinct Neurocognitive Bases of Oral Reading and Silent Word Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara M DyslinGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-1081
Andrew T DeMarcoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-2012
Ryan StaplesDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9440-4767
J Vivian DickensDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-5442
Sarah F SniderDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-0460
Rhonda FriedmanDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6366-5251
Peter E TurkeltaubDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2080-6055

Funding

Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Brain networks for reading in stroke alexia and typical agingR01DC020446 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RHONDA B FRIEDMAN, Peter Ethan Turkeltaub · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Georgetown University Brain and Language Training ProgramT32DC019481 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Peter Ethan Turkeltaub · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020446NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC019481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral reading relies on lexical and sublexical processes with distinct neural mechanisms. Damage within the sublexical system causes phonological alexia, a blanket diagnosis describing acquired deficits in reading unfamiliar words. Improving the precision of alexia diagnosis requires understanding the neurocognitive basis of specific reading subprocesses. This study investigated the neural correlates of sublexical reading in 64 adults with chronic left-hemisphere stroke (LHS), focusing on lesions that impair the use of learned orthography-to-phonology (OP) mappings to read new words. Participants read aloud real words and three types of pseudowords varying in the number of plausible OP mappings at the level of the orthographic body: zero mappings (0M), one mapping (1M), and multiple mappings (MM). LHS participants exhibited phonological reading deficits with an exaggerated lexicality effect compared to 71 neurotypical controls. Across both groups, pseudowords with learned OP mappings were read more accurately than those without. Voxelwise and connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping revealed that relative lexical reading deficits were associated with lateral temporal lesions, while sublexical reading deficits were associated with lesions or disconnections of the left inferior frontal (IFG), supramarginal, and pre/postcentral gyri. Applying learned OP mappings relied on anterior IFG and frontoparietal connections, while resolving multiple plausible OP mappings relied on intraparietal connections. These results underscore the role of learned mutigraphemic OP mappings in sublexical reading, and demonstrate that disruptions of different sublexical reading subprocesses result in subtly different deficit patterns. Dissecting the neurocognitive basis of reading subprocesses may improve the precision of alexia diagnosis and point to new treatments.

Indexed as

alexiaaphasiadyslexialesion-symptom mappingphonologyreading

Identifiers

PMID41822140
PMCPMC12978678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.