Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822094›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2022

Real-word evaluation of differences in bowel preparation for colonoscopy between the digestive and the non-digestive physicians: A retrospective study.

Cenqin Liu, Xin Yuan, Hui Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Weihong Wang, Jiarong Xie, Hongpeng Lu, Jian Chen, Chaohui Yu, Lei Xu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04738578 (A Comparison of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Between Digestive Physicians and Non-digestive Physicians), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04738578 completednot on this map

A Comparison of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Between Digestive Physicians and Non-digestive Physicians

TypeobservationalSponsorNingbo No. 1 HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled671ConditionsBowel Preparation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cenqin LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo Hospital, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, China.
Xin YuanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Hui GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Zhixin ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Weihong WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Jiarong XieDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Hongpeng LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Jian ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xiangshan County Red Cross Taiwan Compatriots Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Chaohui YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lei XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo Hospital, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Using real-world data, we compared the quality of bowel preparation instructed by the digestive and non-digestive physicians in outpatients for colonoscopy and identified potential risk factors. Methods: This was a retrospective study based on real-world data, which were collected from the Ningbo First Hospital in China from December 2019 to October 2020. Outpatients included were classified into the digestive and the non-digestive physician groups according to the referring physician. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), namely, a BBPS score of 2 or higher in any colonic segment and a total score ≥ 6. Secondary outcomes included the total mean BBPS scores and possible risk factors associated with poor bowel preparation. Results: There were 671 outpatients included, with 392 in the digestive physician group and 279 in the non-digestive physician group. Adequate bowel preparation was 84.2% in the digestive physician group and 71.0% in the non-digestive physician group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50, Conclusion: The quality of bowel preparations instructed by non-digestive physicians was inferior to digestive physicians, which was a factor potentially associated with poor bowel preparation (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04738578).

Indexed as

bowel preparationcolonoscopyphysicianspredictive factorsreal-word

Identifiers

PMID41822094
PMCPMC12952467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.