ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2026
Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Cancer Patients With Sepsis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer and its various treatment modalities increase susceptibility to the development of sepsis. Because of the complex relationship between sepsis and cancer, we aimed to study the differences in risk factors and outcomes of sepsis in patients with cancer (SCa) compared to patients without cancer (SnoCa). Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients who received care for sepsis in an urban tertiary healthcare center was conducted. Risk factors and outcomes were compared between the SCa and SnoCa groups. Results: SCa group (n = 310) was older than SnoCa group (n = 628) (66.8 vs. 61.5 years; P < 0.01). There were higher associations of certain variables in the SCa group compared to the SnoCa group, such as male sex (55.8% vs. 48.2%; P = 0.03), White race (60.6% vs. 51.7%; P = 0.01), lower body mass index (BMI) (28.10 ± 9.3 vs. 30.02 ± 10.4 kg/m Conclusion: Compared to patients with sepsis without cancer, patients with sepsis and cancer have higher association with older age, male sex, White race, lower BMI, and TIA, and lower association with recreational drug use and DM. Patients with sepsis and cancer have lower LOS, higher all-cause mortality and have no difference in readmissions, bloodstream infections, and in-hospital mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.