SynthesisFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Role of thalidomide in angiodysplasia-related gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Angiodysplasia of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a leading cause of occult GI bleeding, and its management remains challenging. Various pharmacologic and endoscopic therapies are used with limited success. This systematic review evaluates the clinical efficacy of thalidomide in angiodysplasia-related GI bleeding. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL using MeSH terms "Vascular malformations" OR "Angiodysplasia" AND "Thalidomide," covering the period from 1994 to February 16, 2024. We included clinical trials and case series with at least five adult patients treated with thalidomide for angiodysplasia-related GI bleeding. Six studies met the inclusion criteria: two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective observational study, and three case series. Results: A total of 265 patients were included, with a median age of 63.5 years; 37% were male. Angiodysplasia was diagnosed using endoscopy, colonoscopy, or push enteroscopy. Clinical outcomes varied across studies. Garrido et al. reported an 84% response rate based on hemoglobin improvement. In an RCT, Chen et al. demonstrated reduced bleeding episodes in 68.6% of patients receiving thalidomide 100 mg compared with 51% in the 50 mg group. Ge et al. reported a response rate of 71.4% (20/28) in the thalidomide group versus 3.7% (1/27) in the iron group (risk difference 67.7%, 95% CI 51.1-84.2). Common adverse effects included constipation, dizziness, fatigue, limb numbness, and peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion: Thalidomide appears effective in reducing bleeding episodes in angiodysplasia-related GI bleeding. However, heterogeneity in dosing, outcome definitions, and safety reporting highlights the need for larger, standardized trials to clarify optimal treatment strategies and long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.