ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2026
Universal Screening of Newborns from a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Prospective Analytical Study.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of hearing impairment and significant risk factors for congenital loss in a tertiary hospital in South India. Methods: Over 3 years, a prospective analytical study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary hospital in South India. All newborns born in the hospital or those referred were initially screened using the Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) in a soundproof room by a trained audiologist at 24 to 48 hours of birth. Results were either "PASS" or "REFER." Those who did not pass the initial screening were retested with TEOAE at their 6-week vaccination appointment. If the second result was "REFER," the neonate underwent Brain Evoked Response Auditory (BERA) for confirmation. Results: A total of 3,679 neonates (1,931 males, 1,748 females) underwent TEOAE testing. Of those, 2,426 (65.9%) passed the first test, and 1,253 (34.1%) were referred. The second TEOAE test was done for 1,174 patients, with results of 1,013 (86.29%) as "PASS" and 161 (13.71%) as "REFER." The BERA results of 95 neonates showed normal in 84 (88.42%), and 11 (11.58%) had profound hearing loss. The prevalence of hearing impairment in the present study was 0.29% (95% CI: 0.2-0.6%). Major risk factors such as maternal infections, like toxoplasmosis, others (syphilis, hepatitis B), rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex (TORCH), craniofacial anomalies, low birth weight < 1,500 g, low Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) scores (0-4 at 1 minute and 0-6 at 5 minutes), and mechanical ventilation lasting for 5 days or longer, were significantly associated with hearing impairment at Conclusion: Newborn hearing screenings must be made mandatory, irrespective of risk factors. This way, early diagnosis and necessary interventions can be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.