Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821941›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Study on automatic detection of wheat spike grain number based on deep learning.

Hecang Zang, Yanjing Wang, Shengwei Wang, Shuai Ren, Yandong Yang, Jie Zhang, Qing Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hecang Zang *Institute of Agricultural Information Technology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Yanjing Wang *School of Life Science, Zhengzhou Normal University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shengwei WangAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuai RenXinxiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang, China.
Yandong YangInstitute of Agricultural Information Technology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Jie ZhangInstitute of Agricultural Information Technology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Qing ZhaoInstitute of Agricultural Information Technology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In wheat breeding, the number of spike grains is a key indicator for evaluating wheat yield, and timely and accurate detection of wheat spike grain is of great practical significance for yield estimation. However, in actual field production, the counting of spike grain still relies on manual counting after threshing, which poses problems such as complex measurement processes, time-consuming and laborious. At present, achieving automated and intelligent detection of wheat spike grain still faces significant challenge. Therefore, the focus of this study is to use the most advanced computer vision technology for fast and automatic detection of wheat spike grain. During the wheat filling stage, a total of 936 wheat spike grain images were collected, and these images were expanded through data augmentation to ultimately obtain 3700 wheat spike grain images. According to the partition ratio of the small scale dataset, 80% of the 3700 images are used for training, 10% for validation, and the remaining 10% for testing. This study selected six state-of-the-art deep learning models: YOLOv8n, YOLOv8s, YOLOv8m, YOLOv8l, YOLOv8x, and Faster R-CNN. In all wheat spike grain test, YOLOv8n showed high precision, recall, mAP50, and mAP50-95, with values of 96.8%, 96.8%, 98.9%, and 58.4%, respectively. The precision of other models was 96.7% for YOLOv8m, 96.5% for YOLOv8s, 96.3% for YOLOv8l, 96.2% for YOLOv8x, and 95.7% for Faster R-CNN. YOLOv8n not only has a lower number of parameters, FLOPs, inference time, model size, and GPU memory usage, as well as higher detection precision in wheat spike grain counting tasks, fully meet the spike grain counting requirements of wheat breeding. The multi-scale feature fusion and lightweight computing of YOLOv8n help improve model performance, and its performance is better compared to other deep learning models. This study designed and implemented a WeChat mini program for wheat spike grain counting, so as to achieve automatic detection and counting of wheat spike grains, which provided valuable reference for grain detection, counting, and yield estimation of other crops.

Indexed as

deep learningfield phenotypespike grainstarget detectionwheat

Identifiers

PMID41821941
PMCPMC12975923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.