Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821932›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Extrachromosomal circular DNA are functional, heritable units that expand genomic plasticity and confer resilience.

Dana R MacGregor, Christopher A Saski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dana R MacGregorRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Christopher A SaskiDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although far less well-known and understood than chromosomal DNA, extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) are a pervasive and dynamic component of eukaryotic genomes. eccDNA are nuclear-localized, double-stranded DNA circles that exist independently of the main chromatin body. They share many sequence features with chromosomal DNA, including encoding functional genes; however, unlike chromosomes, eccDNAs are highly heterogenous, capable of autonomous replication and ultra-high gene expression, and do not necessarily segregate evenly or follow Mendelian inheritance during cell division. Although several recent reviews have focused on their roles in human health, emerging research in plants shows that eccDNAs are intricately associated with rapid adaptation to stress, particularly in weedy and invasive plants. This plant-centric review synthesizes evidence that eccDNAs carry full-length genes, regulatory elements, and transposable sequences, that collectively enable gene amplification, novel protein variants, and context-specific expression. We propose that eccDNAs function as "genomic shock absorbers": stress-inducible, non-Mendelian reservoirs of genetic diversity that buffer genomes against environmental challenges such as nutrient limitation and xenobiotic exposure. Drawing parallels with bacterial plasmids, we argue that eccDNA facilitate novel and important genome-environment interactions beyond those mediated by chromosomes. Harnessing these elements as non-Mendelian vehicles for genetic innovation could offer a route to translate weed-derived resilience into novel crop improvement strategies, enabling the design of climate-ready, stress-resilient agriculture grounded in weed inspired mechanisms of adaptability and tolerance.

Indexed as

extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA)functional genomicsnon-Mendelian inheritancephenotypic plasticityrapid adaptationstress tolerance

Identifiers

PMID41821932
PMCPMC12975422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.