ArticleCentral European journal of urology2026
Emergency computed tomography in acute renal colic is essential for correct diagnosis and shortens time to treatment and stone-free status.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of implementing routine emergency computed tomography (eCT) for all patients presenting with suspected acute renal colic at the emergency department (ED). Material and methods: We did a retrospective observational study of all patients who underwent eCT for suspected acute renal colic at the ED in Helsingborg between May 9, 2023 and May 8, 2024 and compared with a 2019/2020 cohort not using routine eCT. Results: Of 66,540 ED visits during the study period, 1,566 patients underwent eCT for suspected acute renal colic; 1,261 were included in the analysis after exclusions. In 57% of patients, no symptomatic stone was identified; nevertheless, one fifth required hospital admission for alternative diagnoses. A radiologically proven stone explaining their symptoms was found in 43% of patients. Compared with the 2019/2020 cohort, the 2023/2024 cohort had more treatments (33% vs 21%), and significantly shorter time to both treatment (p = 0.01) and clinical closure (p <0.001). Stone size, location, type of treatment and number of visits to the ED were comparable between the two cohorts. Conclusions: Acute renal colic in its clinical presentation appeared to be less diagnostically reliable than previously assumed. The use of eCT ensured accurate diagnosis of urolithiasis, significantly shortened time to treatment, and to a stone-free patient as well as reduced the use of stents. We propose that eCT should be implemented as a routine procedure in the management of acute renal colic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.