SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Prognostic factors in young patients with oral cavity cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Young-onset oral cancer is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity, yet prognostic determinants in this population remain poorly defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and synthesize prognostic factors associated with overall survival among young patients with oral and tongue cancers. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on September 23, 2024. Eligible studies included observational cohorts reporting regression-derived prognostic estimates in young patients with oral cancer. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were pooled using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood, whereas unadjusted estimates were narratively summarized. Risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Subgroup analyses were not feasible due to limited stratified reporting, and publication bias was not evaluated because all pooled analyses contained fewer than ten studies. Results: Twenty-four studies encompassing 6,965 young patients were included. Several demographic factors showed no significant association with survival, including age and sex, while Black race was associated with worse outcomes (aHR = 2.79, 95% CI 1.40-5.56). Tumor characteristics linked to poorer prognosis included larger tumor size (aHR = 1.01 per cm, 95% CI 1.00-1.03) and greater depth of invasion (aHR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05). High-grade tumors (grade 3-4) (aHR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.52-2.77) and poorly differentiated histology (aHR = 7.75, 95% CI 2.61-23.01) demonstrated strong adverse prognostic associations. Nodal disease significantly increased risk, including higher N stage (aHR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37) and N+ status (aHR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.24-2.85). Single-study findings-such as TERTp mutation (aHR = 3.00), PRKCA mutation (aHR = 3.57), Stage IVB, disease recurrence, and several treatment-related variables-suggest possible associations but remain inconclusive. Conclusions: Among young patients with oral and tongue cancer, nodal involvement, high-grade or poorly differentiated tumors, increased depth of invasion, and larger tumor size were the most consistently associated with poorer survival. Evidence for molecular and treatment-related factors is limited and requires further validation. These findings highlight the need for standardized reporting and prospective studies tailored to young-onset disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.