ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
EGFRvIII expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: clinical significance and sources of frequency variation across studies.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
EGFRvIII is a tumor-specific, gain-of-function mutation of the EGFR gene that was first detected in 1990 in glioblastoma. For the past two decades, its significance in head and neck cancer has been intensely debated, both in terms of its clinical implications and its mere presence in the disease. This review aims to synthesize evidence on the prevalence, frequency, detection methods, and clinical significance of EGFRvIII in head and neck cancer studies. Our search included major databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with keywords such as EGFRvIII, EGFR variants, and head and neck cancer, and stratified the results using Boolean logic to enhance relevance and specificity. Data extraction involved classifying studies by detection method, anatomic subsite, etiology, geography, and population size. The results revealed a frequency of EGFRvIII expression ranging from 0 to 75% across studies, with the major factors influencing this variation being technical sensitivity and specificity issues, primer set variability, sample type and quality heterogeneity, low prevalence and statistical power, and the lack of validation standards. There appears to be an association with a poorer clinical prognosis, though the association with survival remains inconsistent across studies. For future research, it is preferable to be informed about methodological rigor and orthogonal diagnostic assays with extensive prospective validation. Understanding EGFRvIII's genuine frequency and prognostic utility in HNSCC will help guide biomarker development and targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.