Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821885›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026

Impact of HPV vaccine on CIN2+ recurrence after conization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of vaccination timing, valency and surgical margins.

Mauro Francesco Pio Maiorano, Ambrogio Cazzolla, Brigida Anna Maiorano, Vera Loizzi, Gennaro Cormio, Giuseppe Colonna, Salvatore Lopez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mauro Francesco Pio MaioranoUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Polyclinic of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Ambrogio CazzollaUnit of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS "Giovanni Paolo II" Oncologic Institute, Bari, Italy.
Brigida Anna MaioranoDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Vera LoizziUnit of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS "Giovanni Paolo II" Oncologic Institute, Bari, Italy.
Gennaro CormioUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Polyclinic of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe ColonnaUnit of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS "Giovanni Paolo II" Oncologic Institute, Bari, Italy.
Salvatore LopezUnit of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS "Giovanni Paolo II" Oncologic Institute, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prophylactic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines prevent high-grade cervical lesions, but their role as adjuvant therapy after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) remains uncertain, particularly regarding vaccine type, timing, and margin status. This review aimed to quantify the effect of adjuvant HPV vaccination on CIN2+ recurrence after conization and to determine whether vaccine valency, timing of administration (before vs after surgery), and cone margin status modify this effect. Methods: We performed a PROSPERO-registered (CRD420251042109) systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and cohort studies comparing HPV vaccination versus no vaccination in women treated with conization and/or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for histologically confirmed CIN2+. The primary outcome was recurrent CIN2+; secondary outcomes were HPV persistence/reinfection and vaccine-related adverse events. Random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RRs), with preplanned subgroup analyses by vaccine valency (bivalent, quadrivalent, nonavalent), timing of vaccination (before vs after conization), and cone margin status (positive vs negative), alongside sensitivity and GRADE certainty assessments. Results: Seventeen studies (four randomized controlled trials [RCTs], thirteen cohorts), including 33,181 women (6,665 vaccinated; 26,516 unvaccinated), met inclusion criteria. Overall, adjuvant HPV vaccination was associated with a 62% relative reduction in CIN2+ recurrence (pooled RR 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.51; I² = 58.6%). Subgroup analyses showed similar benefit across valencies (bivalent RR 0.50, quadrivalent RR 0.37, nonavalent RR 0.41; p for subgroup difference = 0.94), vaccination before versus after conization (RR 0.57 vs 0.72; p = 0.35), and in both margin-negative (RR 0.34) and margin-positive (RR 0.40) women (p = 0.63). Data on HPV persistence suggested a predominantly prophylactic mechanism (prevention of new/re-infection rather than clearance), and no new safety signals emerged. Conclusions: Adjuvant prophylactic HPV vaccination meaningfully lowers CIN2+ recurrence after conization across vaccine types and clinical subgroups, supporting its integration into routine post-excisional care for eligible women as a low-burden strategy to reduce repeat procedures, preserve reproductive potential, and help avert progression to cervical cancer. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251042109, identifier CRD420251042109.

Indexed as

cervical cancer conizationcervical conizationGardasil vaccineHPV vaccineHPV vaccine after conizationHPV vaccine CINHPV vaccine conization systematic reviewhuman papillomavirus infection

Identifiers

PMID41821885
PMCPMC12975468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.