ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Deep learning interpretability in neuroimaging: A comprehensive survey and methodological recommendations.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models have experienced a surge in popularity due to their capacity to directly learn from raw data in an end-to-end paradigm without relying on a separate feature extraction process that may be based on restrictive assumptions. The neuroimaging community has enthusiastically embraced DL as it strives to learn biomarkers from complex, multivariate, multimodal datasets. However, a broad replacement of human intelligence with DL in clinical environments is yet far from realization. One of the major obstacles to this transition is the opacity of DL models. A deep understanding of models is essential for their effective deployment in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, where transparency and trust hold substantial significance. We provide a comprehensive review of the interpretability literature, specifically focusing on the current status of DL interpretability in neuroimaging studies. Ultimately, we highlight strategies and insights necessary for successfully integrating DL technology in characterizing and addressing mental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.