ReviewFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2023
Monitoring of patients with active inflammatory bowel disease.
Review in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn's disease assessment: a systematic review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Pooled it
- Non-invasive assessment of inflammatory bowel disease activity using a DIA-derived stool peptidomic signature and machine learning.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Advancing Therapeutic Targets in IBD: Emerging Goals and Precision Medicine Approaches.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Current Approaches for Monitoring of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Crohn's disease management: translating STRIDE-II for UK clinical practice.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Crohn's disease: an update.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current treat-to-target era, close and tight monitoring of patients with inflammatory bowel disease has become increasingly important. Although the importance of patient reported outcomes (PROMs) cannot be underestimated, its moderate association with biochemical and histo-endoscopic outcomes highlights the need for additional monitoring strategies. Endoscopic and histological remission are linked with improved long-term outcomes, but require more invasive assessments. Hence, non-invasive monitoring modalities are becoming increasingly relevant, with emerging evidence demonstrating the added clinical value of transmural assessment, both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The current review covers the multiple treatment targets present in IBD care, and focusses in particular on the increasing importance of intestinal ultrasound. Finally, we propose a potential algorithm to monitor patients with IBD in daily clinical practice and highlight gaps for future research in monitoring IBD strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.