Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821692›Full record

ArticleFood science of animal resources2025

Quality Improvement of Goat Meat-Fermented Sausage Using Pineapple and Fig Powders for the Elderly.

Shine Htet Aung, Rupasinghe Ramesh Nimantha, Young-Sun Choi, Ki-Chang Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shine Htet AungDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-0141
Rupasinghe Ramesh NimanthaDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9984-5622
Young-Sun ChoiJeollanamdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services, Gangjin 59213, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6843-7423
Ki-Chang NamDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-3045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physicochemical properties and sensory evaluation of goat meat-fermented sausages were investigated by incorporating different concentrations of pineapple and fig powders (0.1%, 0.25%, and 0.5%). During processing, moisture, pH, and CIE L* decreased, whereas fat content, antioxidant activity, and CIE a* increased. When pineapple and fig powders were added, the moisture, antioxidant activity, CIE L*, protein degradation, and tenderness of the sausages increased. As the incorporation of pineapple and fig powders increased, the pH, fat, CIE a*, protein, total plate count, metmyoglobin, and residual nitrite content of the sausages decreased. In particular, the addition of 0.5% pineapple powder strongly decreased the pH, total plate count, metmyoglobin, and residual nitrite content, and increased protein degradation. The inclusion of 0.5% fig powder significantly decreased fat content and increased tenderness. In addition, 0.1% pineapple and 0.25% fig powder-treated sausages indicated good nutritional indices in the fatty acid profile. However, the incorporation of 0.5% pineapple and 0.25% fig powders resulted in the highest overall acceptance rates. Based on these investigations, pineapple and fig powder-treated goat meat fermented sausages could fulfil the nutritional requirements of the consumers due to tenderness, protein degradation, and high nutritional index.

Indexed as

fermented sausagefiggoat meatpineappleprotein degradation

Identifiers

PMID41821692
PMCPMC12965270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.