Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821666›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2026

Diffusion MRI sampling schemes bias diffusion metrics and tractography.

Ivanei Bramati, Diego Szczupak, Marina Carneiro Monteiro, Fernanda Meireles, Daniel Menezes Guimarães, Ryan J Dean, Lynn K Paul, Fernanda Tovar-Moll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivanei BramatiDepartment of Brain Connectivity and Plasticity, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Diego SzczupakIRC5 - International Research Consortium for the Corpus Callosum and Cerebral Connectivity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marina Carneiro MonteiroDepartment of Brain Connectivity and Plasticity, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernanda MeirelesDepartment of Brain Connectivity and Plasticity, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daniel Menezes GuimarãesDepartment of Brain Connectivity and Plasticity, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ryan J DeanIRC5 - International Research Consortium for the Corpus Callosum and Cerebral Connectivity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lynn K PaulIRC5 - International Research Consortium for the Corpus Callosum and Cerebral Connectivity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernanda Tovar-MollDepartment of Brain Connectivity and Plasticity, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diffusion MRI is increasingly used to study white-matter architecture, but tractography and diffusion metrics can be biased by different sampling schemes. We assessed systematic differences across four common protocols-single-shell high-angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI), Siemens clinical multi-shell (Sms), diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI), and Human Connectome Project multi-shell (HCPms)-in healthy adults and individuals with corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD). Methods: All data were acquired on a single 3 T scanner and processed uniformly to extract fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), effective contrast-to-noise ratio (eCNR), and orientation dispersion within the corpus callosum (CC), corona radiata (CR), and centrum semiovale (CSO). In controls, we measured tract volumes for CC, bilateral CR, anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC), and streamline counts for AC and PC; in CCD, we quantified volumes of the Probst and sigmoid bundles. Results: Across participants, FA and MD showed moderate cross-scheme correlations for most ROIs, but matched means were rare (only Sms-HARDI in CC). eCNR and dispersion exhibited few cross-scheme correlations; however, means were similar for eCNR between Sms and HCPms and for dispersion among HARDI, DSI, and HCPms. Tract-based volumes correlated across Sms, DSI, and HCPms for CC in controls and for the right sigmoid and both Probst bundles in CCD. DSI and HCPms yielded similar volumes in all ROIs (controls and CCD). In controls, Sms volumes agreed with DSI/HCPms in CR, but were lower in CC and in all CCD ROIs. HARDI produced higher volumes in CC and bilateral CR in controls and in all CCD ROIs. For AC and PC in controls, tract-based means (volumes, streamlines, streamlines/volume) were consistent across schemes; nonetheless, correlations were limited-streamlines and streamlines/volume correlated for Sms, DSI, and HARDI in AC, and for DSI and HCPms in PC. Discussion: These findings demonstrate systematic differences in voxel-wise metrics and tractography outcomes from four diffusion-sampling schemes. In addition to qualitatively informing attempts to consolidate or contrast data across schemes, future work could explore regression-based harmonization-and other methods-to reduce residual bias and enable pooled analyses across diverse protocols.

Indexed as

anomalous white-matter bundlescorpus callosum dysgenesisdiffusion metricsdiffusion MRIharmonizationtractography

Identifiers

PMID41821666
PMCPMC12975589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.