ArticleNature. Mental health2026
An umbrella review of psychological capacity and mental health trajectories across the life course.
Article in Nature. Mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Definition and conceptual framework of the psychological domain of intrinsic capacity in healthy ageing: outcomes from the MOSAIC International Working Group.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding population trajectories of psychological capacities can guide interventions to protect and enhance them across the life course. We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews examining the trajectories of a wide range of psychological capacity measures. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Google Scholar (11 December 2023 and 26 June 2025). Thirty-six reviews synthesizing 1,307 primary studies were included. Here we show that most reviews focused on depression, anxiety and trauma-related symptoms, with stable low-symptom trajectories being most common. Being a girl/woman and socioeconomic disadvantage were frequent risk factors, while social support emerged as protective. We found a comparative lack of reviews focused on less common mental-health conditions, positive outcomes and older adults. Future reviews should engage with a robust quality assessment of the analytical approach used and the (lack of) geographical and sociodemographic diversity in the primary studies included. Similarly, more evidence on the Global South and on minoritized and marginalized groups within populations is needed. The protocol is pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023490490).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.