ArticleFood science of animal resources2025
Effects of High-Pressure, Sous-Vide Cooking and Commercial Freezing on the Physicochemical Properties of Moisture-Enhanced Restructured Pork.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Vitamin DAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Effect of low-temperature sous vide under high-pressure on the moisture retention, tenderness, and color of pork loins.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pretreatments, including heating or freezing for the handling of restructured meat, can cause quality deterioration during cooking due to excessive drip loss. This study investigated the effects of high-pressure (HP) processing (200 MPa for 15 min), cooking methods, and freezing on the quality characteristics of moisture-enhanced restructured pork (MERP). The MERP was formulated to 84% moisture and compared with a control with 74% moisture. The MERP was applied to conventional cooking (75°C for 30 min) and sous-vide cooking (55°C for 24 h), and parts of sous-vide cooked MERP were frozen at -30°C for 24 h to assess quality deterioration. Results revealed that HP cooking effectively bound meat cubes in MERP, and further cooking enhanced the binding strength of MERP products. During cooking, sous-vide improved the moisture retention of MERP. However, freezing increased the cooking loss of MERP, particularly of frozen and reheated MERP, which exhibited the highest cooking loss among the treatments. Despite the fact that the moisture loss of freezing treatments negatively affected the tenderness of the MERP products, frozen MERP retained a tender texture compared with the unfrozen control. HP combined with sous-vide cooking rarely affected the cooked color of MERP, and the MERP products exhibited normal cooked color of meat products. Therefore, the present study indicated that HP and sous-vide cooking improved the quality characteristics of MERP, which suggested that MERP could achieve better consumer preference than typically manufactured restructured meat products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.