Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821530›Full record

ArticleFood science of animal resources2025

Impact of Sous-vide Cooking on Quality Attributes of High-Fat and Low-Fat Cuts of Beef, Pork, and Chicken.

Minjun Kim, Beobmo Ku, Jiwoo Kang, Daehee An, Taeheon Kim, Wonhyoung Park, Jonghyuk Kim, Jinho Cho, Jungseok Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minjun KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3674-6776
Beobmo KuDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0814-2007
Jiwoo KangDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6746-4533
Daehee AnDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2414-2721
Taeheon KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2769-6974
Wonhyoung ParkDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-821X
Jonghyuk KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0289-2949
Jinho ChoDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-0778
Jungseok ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-0410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-fat cuts have gained popularity due to rising consumer interest in health-conscious diets. However, their tough texture and low juiciness necessitate quality improvement through optimized cooking methods. Sous-vide, a cooking method that can enhance tenderness and juiciness, can be a viable solution to address these challenges. This study aimed to compare quality characteristics of high-fat and low-fat cuts of beef (sirloin, BHF; top round, BLF), pork (belly, PHF; ham, PLF), and chicken (thigh, CHF; breast, CLF) before and after sous-vide cooking. All samples were vacuum-sealed and cooked at 70°C for 40 min. Proximate composition, pH, water-holding capacity (WHC), cooking loss, shear force, and color characteristics were analyzed. Results showed that low-fat cuts of raw beef and pork had higher moisture contents than high-fat cuts (p<0.05), although their moisture contents showed no significant differences from those of chicken cuts. BLF exhibited lower pH but higher WHC, cooking loss, and shear force than BHF (p<0.05), while PLF showed higher pH and WHC but lower cooking loss than PHF (p<0.05), although they showed no significant differences in shear force (p>0.05). For chicken, CLF had lower pH and cooking loss but higher shear force than CHF (p<0.05). Results of this study demonstrate that sous-vide cooking can improve the quality of PLF and CLF by reducing cooking loss and shear force. However, further research is needed to optimize sous-vide conditions for BLF to address its high cooking loss and shear force.

Indexed as

high-fatlivestock specieslow-fatquality characteristicssous-vide

Identifiers

PMID41821530
PMCPMC12965365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.