Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821527›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

Optimized facial landmark modeling with medical aesthetic constraints by a multi-objective genetic algorithm.

Yuan Ye, Gangxing Yan, Di Wen, Meijun Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan Ye *Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Gangxing Yan *Faculty of Data Science, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macao SAR, China.
Di WenDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Meijun TanDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Facial Beauty" is not an absolute physical attribute but a subjective social and cultural construct. Facial beauty assessment is an interdisciplinary field that integrates computer vision and medical aesthetics (MAs) to quantify personal judgment regarding facial attractiveness. In this study, the beauty assessment we adopted was based on the scores given by plastic surgeons; this method is more professional and is supported by a theoretical basis. We derived a set of MA features that encompass global traits, local details, and curvature aspects from established aesthetic principles. Incorporating these features enhances predictive accuracy in facial beauty. Furthermore, we propose a feature selection algorithm with aesthetic-driven initialization embedded in a multi-objective evolutionary framework. Additionally, we introduce an MA facial landmark model that provides explicit annotation of bilateral zygomatic, orbital, and nasal points for precise attractiveness scoring. Experimental results on the South China University of Technology-Facial Beauty Perception (SCUT-FBP) and SCUT-FBP5500 datasets and the Chicago Face Dataset demonstrate superior performance (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.8216, mean absolute error = 0.2638, and root mean square error = 0.3743) over state-of-the-art methods, validating its clinical relevance. This study provides a practical tool for beauty evaluation, where the selected features align with professional judgments, enabling transparent and explainable outcomes in both clinical and cosmetic applications.

Indexed as

facial beauty assessmentgenetic algorithmmachine learningmedical aestheticsperformance evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41821527
PMCPMC12975933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.