ReviewJournal of blood medicine2026
Systematic Literature Review of the Economic and Quality of Life Burden of Congenital and Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.
Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic Literature Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Treatments in Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening blood disorder resulting from ADAMTS13 deficiency, caused by mutations in the Methods: Three systematic literature searches were conducted in January 2024 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, each tailored to identify studies reporting economic evaluations, HCRU/cost data, and utility/HRQoL data respectively. For the economic evaluation and utility/HRQoL reviews, inclusion criteria were broadened to include studies reporting data on iTTP and unspecified TTP from which findings for cTTP were inferred. Results: In total 431, 989, and 849 records were identified for the economic evaluation, HCRU/cost, and utility/HRQoL reviews, respectively. No economic evaluations were identified for treatments in cTTP populations. Eight economic studies (all in iTTP) were included. Overall, 5 studies found caplacizumab to be cost-effective, whereas 3 did not, highlighting variability across model assumptions and healthcare settings. Six HCRU/cost studies reported that cTTP was associated with frequent hospital interactions, missed work time, and high costs. Fourteen studies (1 in cTTP, 10 in iTTP, and 3 in unspecified TTP) were included in the utility/HRQoL review and showed that TTP is associated with reduced utility scores and lower HRQoL, irrespective of TTP subtype. Conclusion: These findings underscore the meaningful patient burden observed across the TTP spectrum and highlight the need for further research to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of emerging therapies in cTTP. However, the predominance of iTTP data reflects ongoing challenges in evidence generation for rare TTP subtypes such as cTTP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.