ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Inner Ear Subregion Segmentation in 3D T2-Weighted MRI Using Label-Preserving Data Augmentation.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Image-based deep learning in otology: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inner ear segmentation supports the diagnosis and treatment planning of auditory-related disorders such as Meniere's disease. However, manual annotation of inner ear structures on MR images is both time-consuming and labor-intensive. To address this limitation, we developed a deep learning method that takes T2-weighted MR images as input and segments the inner ear into three subregions: the cochlear basal turn, the cochlear mid-to-apical turn, and the vestibule including the semicircular canals. A total of 74 three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted MR images were retrospectively collected and divided into 50 training cases and 24 internal test cases. In addition, eight MR images from the publicly available Vestibular-Schwannoma-SEG dataset were used as an independent external test set. Ground-truth segmentations for both the internal and external datasets were manually annotated by an experienced radiologist. A 3D transformer-based deep learning model was trained using these annotated data. To further improve segmentation performance, particularly for the thin and intricate semicircular canals, a label-preserving data augmentation strategy was introduced and compared with a conventional data augmentation approach. Segmentation performance was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative assessments. Quantitative evaluation included the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Intersection over union (IoU), and Hausdorff distance (HD). On the internal test set, the proposed method achieved a mean DSC of 0.905 (vs. 0.904), a mean IoU of 0.828 (vs. 0.824), and a mean HD of 2.75 (vs. 3.04) compared with the conventional augmentation approach. On the external dataset, the proposed method demonstrated larger improvements, achieving a mean DSC of 0.919 (vs. 0.847), a mean IoU of 0.852 (vs. 0.738), and a mean HD of 3.92 (vs. 4.45). These results demonstrate that the proposed label-preserving data augmentation method improves the robustness and accuracy of inner ear subregion segmentation, particularly for thin and intricate structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.