Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821441›Full record

ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2026

Assessing the robustness of AI lesion risk scores at different exposure settings using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

L Alström, A Bjerkén, V Dahlblom, P Timberg, M Dustler, A Tingberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L AlströmMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.
A BjerkénMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0005-3775-2876
V DahlblomDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.
P TimbergMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.
M DustlerDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5699-9664
A TingbergMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-0725

Funding

Allmänna sjukhusets i Malmö Stiftelse för bekämpande av CancerRegion Skåne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the robustness of risk scores provided by an artificial intelligence (AI) system for digital mammography (DM), when varying the exposure conditions. An anthropomorphic breast phantom containing a lesion, was imaged with DM at different tube voltages (kV), tube loadings (mAs), and anode/filter combinations (W/Rh, Mo/Mo, and Mo/Rh). The organ doses were extracted from the DICOM header and used as a substitute for average glandular dose. The images were analyzed with an AI system, which provided a lesion risk score which translates to suspicion for malignancy. Correlations between the lesion risk score and the exposure conditions were investigated. In most imaging conditions, weak to moderately strong positive associations between lesion risk scores and kV and mAs, respectively, were reported (varying by anode/filter combinations). When organ dose increased the AI risk scores plateaued, and further increase did not increase the lesion risk score. For typical clinical settings (W/Rh, 27 kV and 71 mAs) the range of lesion risk scores was 33-56 (mean: 42, SD: 9). Greatest reported variability (range: 36-63, mean: 51, SD: 12) was found at 27 kV and 36 mAs (using W/Rh). Images of suboptimal quality may result in inaccurate AI system performance. The unexpectedly large intra-group variability of AI risk scores should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreastBreast NeoplasmsMammographyPhantoms, ImagingFemaleHumansRadiation DosageRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41821441
PMCPMC13046041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.