Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821439›Full record

ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2026

Assessing the influence of kernel selection on chest computed tomography image quality across varying dose levels using TrueFidelity reconstruction.

Eleftheria Gianko, Micael Oliveira Diniz, Walter Cifuentes Ramirez, Rauni Rossi Norrlund, Åse A Johnsson, Magnus Båth, Angelica Svalkvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleftheria GiankoDepartment of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0009-4123-4085
Micael Oliveira DinizDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-136X
Walter Cifuentes RamirezRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Rauni Rossi NorrlundDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9192-7439
Åse A JohnssonDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Magnus BåthDepartment of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4004-2603
Angelica SvalkvistDepartment of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

ALF-agreement ALFGBG-10005769ALF-agreement ALFGBG-877491ALF-agreement ALFGBG-960671Swedish government and the country councils
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) utilizes neural networks to generate high-quality computed tomography (CT) images. One commercially available DLIR software is TrueFidelity from GE Healthcare. The Standard kernel was the only available reconstruction kernel previously, but recently other kernels, including the Lung kernel, have been introduced by GE. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality of chest CT scans acquired at full-dose (FD, 2.5 mSv) and ultra-low-dose (ULD, 0.05 mSv) when reconstructed using TrueFidelity with both Standard and Lung kernels. Twenty-five patients underwent chest CT scans at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The images were reconstructed and then evaluated by four radiologists in two different studies, one including ULD CT axial images and the other one the FDCT. Visual Grading Characteristics (VGC) analysis was applied, using the Standard kernel as reference and the area under the VGC curve (AUCVGC) for comparison. At FD, the Standard kernel yielded better results regarding the visualization of six structures and the general image quality. However, in ULD scans, the differences between kernels were not statistically significant. The FD images were mostly rated as acceptable, while ULD images were often rated as probably acceptable or unacceptable, especially for emphysema assessment. Overall, TrueFidelity seems to perform better with the Standard kernel than with the Lung kernel in FD protocols, but no reliable conclusions can be drawn for the ULD protocol.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41821439
PMCPMC13046061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.