ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2026
Assessing the influence of kernel selection on chest computed tomography image quality across varying dose levels using TrueFidelity reconstruction.
Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) utilizes neural networks to generate high-quality computed tomography (CT) images. One commercially available DLIR software is TrueFidelity from GE Healthcare. The Standard kernel was the only available reconstruction kernel previously, but recently other kernels, including the Lung kernel, have been introduced by GE. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality of chest CT scans acquired at full-dose (FD, 2.5 mSv) and ultra-low-dose (ULD, 0.05 mSv) when reconstructed using TrueFidelity with both Standard and Lung kernels. Twenty-five patients underwent chest CT scans at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The images were reconstructed and then evaluated by four radiologists in two different studies, one including ULD CT axial images and the other one the FDCT. Visual Grading Characteristics (VGC) analysis was applied, using the Standard kernel as reference and the area under the VGC curve (AUCVGC) for comparison. At FD, the Standard kernel yielded better results regarding the visualization of six structures and the general image quality. However, in ULD scans, the differences between kernels were not statistically significant. The FD images were mostly rated as acceptable, while ULD images were often rated as probably acceptable or unacceptable, especially for emphysema assessment. Overall, TrueFidelity seems to perform better with the Standard kernel than with the Lung kernel in FD protocols, but no reliable conclusions can be drawn for the ULD protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.