Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821436›Full record

ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2026

Survey of radiological optimization processes in Swedish hospitals-similarities and differences between different modalities.

Angelica Svalkvist, Maria Hultenmo, Pernilla Jonasson, Patrik Sund, Maria Larsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angelica SvalkvistDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gula stråket 2B, plan 0, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8367-1317
Maria HultenmoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gula stråket 2B, plan 0, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1616-0394
Pernilla JonassonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gula stråket 2B, plan 0, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0006-7612-5012
Patrik SundDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gula stråket 2B, plan 0, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9947-1253
Maria LarssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gula stråket 2B, plan 0, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimization process is an important part of image-based diagnostics and treatments, requiring collaboration among medical physicists, radiologists, physicians, radiographers, nurses, engineers, and vendors. However, such teamwork can be challenging in some departments. In spring 2024, questionnaires were sent to Swedish medical physicists working with radiology, interventional radiology, or surgery facilities using radiological equipment. The surveys included modality-specific questions about optimization processes. The aim was to explore differences in optimization processes between modalities and departments, identify common challenges, and understand factors facilitating effective optimization. Results showed variations in optimization processes across different modalities, where successful optimization processes were harder to achieve for stationary fluoroscopy systems and mobile fluoroscopy systems than for the other modalities. Common challenges included limited time and lack of knowledge about image quality issues, while close collaboration, continuous meetings with focus on optimization, and good communication were mentioned as important factors for obtaining successful optimization processes.

Indexed as

HospitalsRadiation ProtectionFluoroscopyHumansRadiation DosageSurveys and QuestionnairesSweden

Identifiers

PMID41821436
PMCPMC13046057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.