ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2026
Survey of radiological optimization processes in Swedish hospitals-similarities and differences between different modalities.
Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimization process is an important part of image-based diagnostics and treatments, requiring collaboration among medical physicists, radiologists, physicians, radiographers, nurses, engineers, and vendors. However, such teamwork can be challenging in some departments. In spring 2024, questionnaires were sent to Swedish medical physicists working with radiology, interventional radiology, or surgery facilities using radiological equipment. The surveys included modality-specific questions about optimization processes. The aim was to explore differences in optimization processes between modalities and departments, identify common challenges, and understand factors facilitating effective optimization. Results showed variations in optimization processes across different modalities, where successful optimization processes were harder to achieve for stationary fluoroscopy systems and mobile fluoroscopy systems than for the other modalities. Common challenges included limited time and lack of knowledge about image quality issues, while close collaboration, continuous meetings with focus on optimization, and good communication were mentioned as important factors for obtaining successful optimization processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.