ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Prescribing skills course: Three years' experience and lessons learnt through India's massive open online course.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prescribing skills course: Three years' experience and lessons learnt through India's massive open online course.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimStudies highlighting the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing and preventable harm emphasize the need to enhance prescribing competencies. This paper describes distinctive features, launch and evaluation of massive open online course (MOOC) Prescribing Skills Course (PSC) designed for medical interns and registered medical practitioners (RMPs).
methodsPSC development funded by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), guided by national and international experts, with content aligned with the national medical curriculum and inputs from stakeholders, included video lectures with case scenarios, demonstration videos, assignments (pre- and post-course MCQ tests, prescription analysis) and structured feedback. Hosted on Government of India's online learning platform, course infrastructure enabled data collection for evaluation and analysis.
resultsPSC having 50 modules was conducted with interns' enrolment/completion 4327/1164 (26.9%), 4098/815 (19.9%), 665/ 129 (19.4%) in 2020, 2021, 2022 and RMPs 1984/557(28.1%), 448/138 (30.8%) in 2021, 2022, respectively. Enrolment was significantly lower in regions with weaker health indices (rate ratio 0.35 with 95% CI: 0.32-0.38; P < 0.001; Poisson regression test). Participants rated course content, relevance, quality, assignment usefulness 'excellent' to 'very good'. RMPs demonstrated higher baseline scores and greater improvement (from 60% to 73.3% p < 0.001 in cycle 3) compared to interns.
conclusionThe PSC- MOOC is convenient, accessible with experiential learning for large numbers. Performance of RMPs may suggest practical relevance and applicability. Module-wise performance analysis and enrolment variation provided insights for future strategy. Limitations include inability to assess the impact on prescribing practices. PSC-MOOC represents a promising, scalable educational strategy. Our experience would be useful to other countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.