ArticleTransfusion2026
Revealing and quantifying polyclonal anti-A, B specificity in ABO histo-blood groups.
Article in Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinically significant antibody anti-A,B together with anti-A and anti-B has been known for many decades to be present in blood group O plasma. As anti-A,B is only reactive when an A or B antigen is present, its contribution to titer cannot be easily distinguished from anti-A and/or anti-B. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsChemically synthesized AB epitope (ABep) was attached onto red cells creating ABep-kodecytes; methodology was optimized and then used together with group A- and B-kodecytes to semi-quantitative undiluted plasma samples of all ABO blood groups for anti-A, anti-B, and anti-A,B. Standard titers with plasma dilutions against natural A
resultsABep20-kodecytes were able to semi-quantitate anti-A,B independently of anti-A and anti-B. Anti-A and anti-B levels were also able to be inferred by deduction of the anti-A,B contribution. There was a large range in the levels of anti-A,B in the group O samples, including in those determined to have high-titer ABO antibodies. Unexpectedly, some group A, B, and AB individuals were also found to have an anti-A,B-like antibody. DISCUSSION: Anti-A,B is a much more complex antibody than current understanding, and shows a range of activity over a large continuum, which includes in vitro detectable anti-A,B-like antibodies in non-group O samples. The ability to measure anti-A,B independently of anti-A and anti-B levels may be useful in evaluating clinical associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.