Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821247›Full record

Trial reportBrain and behavior2026

A Pilot Intervention for Antisocial Personality Traits in Male Prisoners: The Conditional Effect of Rule-Breaking.

Mustafa Özmen, Müjgan Kalabalık

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mustafa ÖzmenVocational School of Health Services, Bingöl University, Bingöl, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-7498
Müjgan KalabalıkBingöl Open Prison, Directorate General of Prisons and Detention Centres, Ministry of Justice, Bingöl, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8764-7120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that a significant proportion of the growing number of individuals in prisons may have antisocial personality traits (ASPT), it is important to test and report on the results of pilot psycho-educational intervention programmes developed for this purpose.

aimThe primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of the psychoeducation programme on ASPT among prisoners. The secondary aim is to investigate whether there is any interaction between ASPT after intervention.

methodsTwenty-six participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 13) and the control group (n = 13). The ASPT Scale was administered as a pre-test and post-test at 8-week intervals. Findings were examined using independent samples t-tests and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) via SPSS 27. PROCESS macro was used to examine whether reductions in the aggression subscale were moderated by rule-breaking.

resultsGroup-based psychoeducational intervention did not lead to effective results in overall ASPT scores in the experimental group. However, intervention led to significant decreases in aggression scores both within groups (p < 0.01) and between groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, it was found that a decrease in aggression scores was moderated by rule-breaking scores of the prisoners (β = 0.60, p < 0.05, [0.88; 1.12]).

conclusionsGroup-based psychoeducational interventions are associated with a reduction in aggressive behavior among prisoners. In experimental interventions aimed at reducing aggressive behavior, it is important to prioritize individuals with low levels of rule-breaking tendencies.

Indexed as

AggressionAntisocial Personality DisorderPrisonersAdultHumansMalePilot Projectsaggressionantisocial personality traitsexperimental interventionprisonersrule‐breaking

Identifiers

PMID41821247
PMCPMC13093802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.