ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2026
Shifting the narrative from 'what's wrong?' to 'what's strong?' MIND-MAP: A qualitative study exploring positive mental health and support needs of adults with diabetes.
Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shifting the narrative from 'what's wrong?' to 'what's strong?' MIND-MAP: A qualitative study exploring positive mental health and support needs of adults with diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore factors that foster positive mental health among adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and identify opportunities for more accessible, person-centred mental health support within diabetes care.
methodsParticipants were purposively sampled from the Mental health IN Diabetes Monitoring And Pathways (MIND-MAP) cohort study. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with 32 adults in Victoria, Australia. Interviews explored factors associated with emotional well-being and experiences and preferences for mental health support. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, informed by phenomenology and constructivist grounded theory. The study was co-designed with guidance from a multidisciplinary Steering Committee and lived experience input through a Community Advisory Group comprising 12 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
resultsParticipants described internal strengths (e.g. acceptance, perspective-taking) and external supports (e.g. peer connections, empathetic health professionals, timely access to mental health care) that supported their mental health. Several barriers to accessing mental health support were reported, including limited-service access, geographic and financial constraints, discomfort discussing emotions, and a lack of diabetes-specific mental health expertise. Emotional support was often absent at diagnosis and other key transition points. Participants called for support that is empathetic, non-judgemental, tailored and embedded within diabetes services.
conclusionAdults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes show resilience in managing mental health, yet systemic, practical and attitudinal barriers remain. Care models should build on personal strengths, normalise emotional support and integrate psychological care from diagnosis, as well as harness the value of peer support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.