Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821225›Full record

ArticlePediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2026

Direct single dose mass delabelling of antibiotic allergy in pediatrics.

Sheena Coyne, Aideen Byrne, Amber Gill, Davina Henderson, Kara Tedford, Victoria Mc Donald, Helen O'Connor, Catherine Breen, Aisling Stafford, Maeve Kelleher and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Direct single dose mass delabelling of antibiotic allergy in pediatrics.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sheena CoyneChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2812-6502
Aideen ByrneChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Amber GillChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Davina HendersonChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Kara TedfordChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Victoria Mc DonaldChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Helen O'ConnorChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine BreenChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6621-5587
Aisling StaffordChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Maeve KelleherChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
David CoghlanChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Jonathan HourihaneChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-9857

Funding

Children's Health Foundation SFG-24-TRA008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnsubstantiated antibiotic allergy labels affect between 8% and 25% of the population worldwide. Current risk stratification tools, derived from adult data, are not validated for children. A simplified, multi-patient protocol with minimal exclusion criteria is required to tackle the scale of this public health issue.

methodsPatients with possible antibiotic allergy were recruited from the Children's Health Ireland (CHI) allergy waiting list. Exclusion criteria were a serum sickness like reaction (SSLR), severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCARs), anaphylaxis, or non-allergic symptoms. No prior allergy testing was performed. Dosing was direct single observed dosing in dedicated mass delabelling clinics, followed by a two-day home antibiotic course.

resultsConsenting patients (n = 162) were seen over 6 clinics with gradually increasing clinic sizes (Range 18 to 62, average 23). One patient only was excluded based on the severity of their index event. Average age was 7 years, n = 90/162 (55.6%) were female. Most were avoiding amoxicillin, n = 137/162 (84.6%). Negative challenge rates were similar to previous studies, n = 150/162 (92.6%), 3 had immediate reactions and 9 delayed (all non-severe). Patients retrospectively underwent risk stratification according to the 2024 EAACI position paper, high risk n = 38/162 (23.5%), intermediate risk n = 74/162 (45.7%) and low risk n = 50/162 (30.9%). Those deemed high risk were no more likely to have a positive challenge than those deemed low/intermediate risk (n = 2/38, 5.3% vs. n = 10/124, 8.1%, p = .56).

conclusionAntibiotic allergy delabelling in pediatrics is low risk and can be done safely in high patient load without prior allergy testing. Current risk stratification tools are not suitable for pediatric-specific models of care.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug HypersensitivityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantIrelandMaleRisk AssessmentAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic allergydelabellingdirect single dosedrug provocation testmass delabellingmislabellingrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41821225
PMCPMC12982911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.