Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821173›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

Spatial behavior of socially isolated wild pigs (Sus scrofa) following sounder removal via trapping.

Sebastian Gomez-Maldonado, Matthew T McDonough, Jonathon J Valente, Mark D Smith, Stephen S Ditchkoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian Gomez-MaldonadoCollege of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5442-295X
Matthew T McDonoughCollege of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Jonathon J ValenteU.S. Geological Survey, Alabama Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Mark D SmithCollege of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Stephen S DitchkoffCollege of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

Funding

Alabama Soil and Water Conservation Commitee
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid expansion of wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations across North America, coupled with increased concern over disease transmission, has intensified the need for effective management strategies. Trapping is widely regarded as the most effective control method; however, trapping events often fail to capture entire sounders. The behavioral responses of untrapped individuals following partial sounder removal remain poorly understood, potentially undermining management efficiency. We evaluated the spatiotemporal movement responses of wild pigs that became socially isolated following trapping events.

resultsWe deployed GPS collars on 18 female wild pigs from multiple sounders and quantified post-trapping movement patterns using distance from trap site, step length, persistence velocity, space covered and overlap area over a 30-day period. Movement responses were highly variable among individuals, but wild pigs travelled an average of 1.2 km from the trap, with a maximum observed distance of 6.37 km. Space-use overlap was limited, and range sizes remained relatively stable. Individuals originating from sounders with a greater proportion of females moved farther from the trap, whereas wild pigs in better body condition exhibited lower movement velocities.

conclusionSocially isolated wild pigs generally remained close to trap sites following partial sounder removal and rarely dispersed from the area. This behavioral pattern suggests a predictable post-trapping window during which untrapped individuals remain spatially accessible. These findings provide critical empirical support for adaptive trapping strategies, indicating that follow-up removal efforts can be effectively concentrated near original trap locations to improve management efficiency and reduce the risk of population persistence or disease spread. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalPest ControlSocial IsolationSpatial BehaviorSus scrofaAnimalsFemaledisease managementintegrated pest managementmovement ecologypest managementspatial behaviorwild pig management

Identifiers

PMID41821173
PMCPMC13158450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.