ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Listening Without the Noise: Near-Silent Looping Star fMRI Reveals Neural Processing of Degraded Speech.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive acoustic noise during fMRI poses challenges for auditory cognitive neuroscience. We aimed to evaluate a near-silent fMRI sequence, Looping Star (LS), for measuring brain responses to acoustically degraded speech. We hypothesized that LS would maintain BOLD sensitivity comparable to conventional Gradient-echo EPI and potentially reveal enhanced activation in brain regions associated with effortful speech processing under degraded listening conditions. Ten healthy adult native German speakers underwent fMRI while passively listening to blocks of spoken sentences under four conditions: clear speech, moderately degraded speech (spectral noise vocoding at ~50% intelligibility), unintelligibly degraded speech and clear speech mixed with EPI-like scanner acoustic noise. Each participant was scanned in four runs (two using standard single-echo EPI and two using the near-silent multi-echo LS sequence) in an alternating order. All fMRI timeseries (single-echo EPI, single-echo LS and echo-combined LS) detected robust bilateral auditory cortex activation for all Sound > silent baseline. Echo-combined LS, however, yielded larger activation clusters and higher peak effect sizes, extending beyond auditory cortex regions. Notably, only echo-combined LS revealed significant activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis) and adjacent regions when comparing all speech stimuli to baseline, whereas EPI and single-echo LS showed no such frontal activation. Direct between-sequence comparisons demonstrated significantly greater BOLD responses in echo-combined LS compared to EPI in key regions (including left insula, left precentral gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus) for the all Sound > baseline and moderately degraded > baseline contrasts. These findings underscore the promise of near-silent fMRI for auditory neuroscience: by virtually eliminating scanner noise, LS fMRI can reveal neural responses to degraded speech that might be masked during loud EPI scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.