Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821124›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2026

Prediction of anxiety in children aged 7-12 during preoperative anaesthesia evaluation - a prospective observational study.

Armin Sablewski, Katarina Krebs, Anna Karstensen, Maximilian Grosser, Charlotte Neitzel, Axel Fudickar, Barbara Schmidt, Tobias Becher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Armin SablewskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. armin.sablewski@uksh.de.
Katarina KrebsDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Anna KarstensenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Maximilian GrosserDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Charlotte NeitzelDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Axel FudickarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Barbara SchmidtInstitute for Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Tobias BecherDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative anxiety is a common challenge in paediatric anaesthesia. High anxiety levels are associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. Although risk factors for preoperative anxiety in children are well known, validated assessment tools are rarely used in everyday clinical practice. Instead, anaesthesiologists rely on clinical judgment during preoperative assessments. However, the accuracy of such anxiety predictions in clinical practice remains unclear.

methodsThis prospective observational study included children aged 7–12 years undergoing elective surgery or diagnostic procedures under general anaesthesia. During the preoperative consultation, anaesthesiologists, parents, and children were asked to predict the child’s anxiety on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while actual anxiety during anaesthesia induction was assessed using the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale – Short Form (mYPAS-SF). Spearman’s correlations (rs) between predicted and observed anxiety were calculated, and the predictive performance for clinically significant anxiety (defined as mYPAS-SF > 30) was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Potential predictors of preoperative anxiety, including demographic and psychosocial factors, were also evaluated.

results91 datasets sets were analysed. Anxiety prediction by parents correlated moderate to children’s anxiety during anaesthesia induction (AUC 0.661; rs=0.327, 95% CI 0.12–0.51). Anxiety predictions by anaesthesiologists (AUC 0.604; rs=0.173, 95% CI -0.04–0.37) and children (AUC 0.612; rs=0.147, 95% CI -0.08–0.36) correlated weakly with children’s anxiety. Children reporting being worried before anaesthesia showed significantly higher anxiety during induction (mYPAS-SF 38.5 [22.9–57.3] vs. 22.9 [22.9–38.0]; P = 0.006). Children’s anxiety at consultation and on the ward correlated with increased anxiety during induction (rs=0.271, 95% CI 0.06–0.46 and rs=0.297, 95% CI 0.09–0.48, respectively). Intravenous induction was associated with lower anxiety compared with inhalational induction (mYPAS-SF 22.9 22.9 [22.9–38.0] vs. 38.5 [22.9–57.3]; P < 0.001). No significant associations were found for age, gender, prior medical experiences, or parental anxiety.

conclusionsClinical anxiety assessments in preoperative consultations are often inaccurate, with parents performing slightly better than anaesthesiologists and children. Structured screening approaches are needed to enhance the early identification of high-risk children and improve perioperative anxiety management.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Registry, registration number DRKS00033395. Date of registration: 06/05/2024.

Indexed as

Anxiety predictionmYPASPaediatric anaesthesiaPreoperative anxietyPreoperative assessment

Identifiers

PMID41821124
PMCPMC13130822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.