ArticleReproductive health2026
Management of miscarriage: a matter of choice? A mixed- methods research study in Northern Ireland.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMiscarriage, defined in the United Kingdom as the loss of a pregnancy before 24 weeks’ gestation, remains the most common gestational complication, affecting 13–15% of all recognised pregnancies. Despite established NICE guidelines outlining three management options—expectant, medical, and surgical—little is known about how these approaches influence women’s emotional wellbeing or sense of autonomy. This mixed-methods study explored women’s experiences of miscarriage management and their emotional needs when attending hospital facilities in Northern Ireland (NI).
methodsA cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and April 2021. Participants (N = 723) were women aged over 16 years who had experienced a miscarriage in NI within the preceding five years. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data were thematically analysed.
findingsFindings revealed that 42% of participants experienced expectant management, 14% medical, 28% surgical, and 16% a combination of treatments. Notably, 52% of respondents reported that they were not given a choice of management, with 36% stating that healthcare professionals made decisions without clear explanation. Among those who were not offered a choice, 40% were dissatisfied with the information received, and 44% felt insufficient time was allowed to discuss options. Conversely, women who were offered choice reported higher satisfaction, clearer communication, and greater perceived emotional support. Thematic analysis identified three central themes from the qualitative data: choice and autonomy, importance of being informed, and time for decision-making.
conclusionThe study highlights a gap between national guidance advocating informed, patient-centred care and women’s lived experiences of miscarriage management in NI. Lack of autonomy and inadequate communication were associated with emotional distress and feelings of disempowerment. Healthcare professionals should ensure women are provided with comprehensive information, sufficient time for decision-making, and genuine choice in treatment whenever medically feasible. Further research is required to examine the long-term psychological impact of different miscarriage management approaches and to inform best practice in compassionate, patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.