Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821089›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026

Perpetual observational study of the clinical and microbiological epidemiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia in Europe.

Holly Jackson, Ana Catalina Hernandez Padilla, Lisanne E M Vintcent, Aleksandra Barac, Olaf Cremer, Thomas Daix, Jan J De Waele, Lorena Forcelledo, Olivier Barraud, Marc J M Bonten and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Holly JacksonInfection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Center, Geneva, Switzerland. holly.jackson@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0646-6437
Ana Catalina Hernandez PadillaInserm CIC 1435, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-7294
Lisanne E M VintcentJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aleksandra BaracUniversity Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-2277
Olaf CremerJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-1108
Thomas DaixInserm CIC 1435, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-7247
Jan J De WaeleDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-9748
Lorena ForcelledoHospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-2463
Olivier BarraudInserm CIC 1435, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-9206
Marc J M BontenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stephan HarbarthInfection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Center, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-1025
Bruno FrancoisInserm CIC 1435, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1652
C H van WerkhovenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-4635
Marlieke E A de KrakerInfection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Center, Geneva, Switzerland. Marlieke.dekraker@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-8614
POS-VAP Study Group
ECRAID-Base Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical and microbiological epidemiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is not well studied in intensive care units (ICUs) European wide. The European Clinical Research Alliance on Infectious Diseases (Ecraid), a warm-base clinical research network investigating infectious diseases, aimed to track the implementation of VAP prevention strategies and quantify the incidence, aetiology, and clinical outcome of VAP, across several European countries.

methodsOverall, 25 ICUs from 11 European countries participating in Ecraid’s perpetual observational study prospectively enrolled adult patients with an expected length of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) of at least 48 h, between August 2022 and September 2024. VAP was defined according to the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Patients were followed until ICU discharge or 28 days after VAP diagnosis. Routine clinical and microbiological data were prospectively collected. Mortality was calculated using cumulative incidence functions.

resultsOf the 3,446 patients at-risk of VAP, 590 developed VAP (cumulative incidence: 17.1%, 95% CI 15.9%-18.4% and incidence rate per 1000 ventilator days: 18.6, 95% CI 17.1–20.1). Importantly, VAP cumulative incidence varied widely between countries recruiting at least 100 patients (range: 7.6% (Croatia)-29.6% (Romania)). Microbiological documentation was available for 359 (60.8%) VAP patients, predominantly showing Staphylococcus aureus (26.2%), Haemophilus influenzae (16.2%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.0%). Methicillin resistance was confirmed in 14 (18.2%) of 77 VAP cases due to S. aureus. Ceftazidime and carbapenem resistance for P. aeruginosa was reported in 10/46 (21.7%) and 8/47 (17.0%) cases, respectively. Cumulative incidence of ICU mortality was 34.2% (95% CI 30.4%-38.0%) among VAP patients versus 29.3% (95% CI 27.6%-30.9%) in non-VAP patients. The overall median IMV duration until first extubation was 17 days in VAP patients (including ventilation before and after diagnosis) versus 7 days for non-VAP patients. The most widely implemented VAP prevention measure was head-of-bed elevation (3207 patients, 93.1%); only 4 patients (0.1%) did not have any prevention measures implemented.

conclusionIn European ICUs, there is a considerable and heterogeneous incidence of VAP, with methicillin susceptible S. aureus most frequently identified as a causative pathogen. VAP is associated with poor clinical prognosis, highlighting the need for better VAP prevention and management strategies.

Indexed as

Pneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedAdultAgedEuropeFemaleHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesEpidemiologyHealthcare-acquired infectionIntensive care unitMicrobiologyOutcomesPrevention measuresVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID41821089
PMCPMC12980874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.