ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Outcomes in hospitalised patients with penicillin allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhen patients report a penicillin allergy (self-reported penicillin allergy, SRPA), clinicians alter their antibiotic management of the patient. However, fewer than 5% of SRPA have life-threatening reactions, and receiving narrower spectrum antibiotics may result in under treatment. Reports from community studies suggest that patients with SRPA are more likely to come to harm, but as SRPA implies exposure to healthcare, it is unclear whether additional harm is as a result of co-morbidities and the need to receive healthcare, rather than a harm in itself. This raises the question of how great an impact SRPA has on hospital and ICU mortality for patients admitted to hospital. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A literature search will be performed using MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (via OVID) in October 2024. The eligible studies will be of adult hospitalised patients with penicillin allergy compared with their non-allergic counterparts. We will extract demographic and outcome data including whether the patients were treated in ICU and mortality (28-days, in-ICU or in-hospital). If possible, the results will be pooled for a meta-analysis by combining the all-cause mortality of patients at 28 days, in-ICU or in-hospital. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I DISCUSSION: Previous reports of poor outcomes from SRPA are often based around increased risk of increased antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance. The requirement of SRPA to develop where there is exposure to healthcare and co-morbidities may mean that these outcomes are derived from poorer health rather than from SRPA perse. The impact of SRPA on hospitalised patients is less understood, with outcomes that are well-defined, such as mortality. This review will outline the differences that exist, and a meta-analysis may define the size of any differences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024537658.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.