Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821077›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2026

Outcomes in hospitalised patients with penicillin allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Elise Davis, Rebecca Gill, Eamonn Reda, Esther Thomas, Malikah Saba, Hanmin Chen, Tony Whitehouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elise DavisUniversity College Hospital London, London, UK.
Rebecca GillDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Eamonn RedaDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Esther ThomasDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Malikah SabaDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Hanmin ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ansteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, Liaoning, China.
Tony WhitehouseDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. t.whitehouse@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-3421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhen patients report a penicillin allergy (self-reported penicillin allergy, SRPA), clinicians alter their antibiotic management of the patient. However, fewer than 5% of SRPA have life-threatening reactions, and receiving narrower spectrum antibiotics may result in under treatment. Reports from community studies suggest that patients with SRPA are more likely to come to harm, but as SRPA implies exposure to healthcare, it is unclear whether additional harm is as a result of co-morbidities and the need to receive healthcare, rather than a harm in itself. This raises the question of how great an impact SRPA has on hospital and ICU mortality for patients admitted to hospital. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A literature search will be performed using MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (via OVID) in October 2024. The eligible studies will be of adult hospitalised patients with penicillin allergy compared with their non-allergic counterparts. We will extract demographic and outcome data including whether the patients were treated in ICU and mortality (28-days, in-ICU or in-hospital). If possible, the results will be pooled for a meta-analysis by combining the all-cause mortality of patients at 28 days, in-ICU or in-hospital. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I DISCUSSION: Previous reports of poor outcomes from SRPA are often based around increased risk of increased antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance. The requirement of SRPA to develop where there is exposure to healthcare and co-morbidities may mean that these outcomes are derived from poorer health rather than from SRPA perse. The impact of SRPA on hospitalised patients is less understood, with outcomes that are well-defined, such as mortality. This review will outline the differences that exist, and a meta-analysis may define the size of any differences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024537658.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug HypersensitivityHospitalizationPenicillinsHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillinsAntibiotic managementICUMeta-analysisMortalityPenicillin allergy

Identifiers

PMID41821077
PMCPMC12983788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.