Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821033›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026

Guiding syringe selection for intravitreal injections: injectability and stability analysis of compounded pegcetacoplan (SYFOVRE) and the broader implications for high-viscosity ophthalmic therapies.

Tina Felfeli, Natalie M Lane, Efrem D Mandelcorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Mechanical stresses on the retina induced by intravitreal injections in an artificial model of the vitreous chamber.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina FelfeliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. tina.felfeli@mail.utoronto.ca.
Natalie M LaneDepartment of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.
Efrem D MandelcornDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSYFOVRE, the brand name of pegcetacoplan and the first FDA-approved treatment for geographic atrophy arising from dry age-related macular degeneration, is currently available only in vial format. Consequently, it is often compounded and transferred into syringes. This study aims to identify the optimal syringe type for both storage and intravitreal injection (IVI) of medium- and high-viscosity formulations such as SYFOVRE.

methodsSYFOVRE was prepared in four syringe types and stored under refrigeration in amber bags for up to 110 days. Samples were evaluated for potency, aggregation, protein integrity, binding activity, pH, appearance, sterility, and container closure integrity. Syringe particulate contribution was examined using light obscuration. Injectability of each syringe was assessed through administration of 15 cP and 120 cP viscosity mimics into the vitreous of human cadaver eyes, and injection force was recorded over time.

resultsPegcetacoplan remained stable across all syringe types for 110 days. The ClearJect (0.5 mL) syringe exceeded particulate safety limits as defined by USP <789>. Ophthalmic-specific syringes (Zero Residual [0.2 mL] and StaClear [0.25 mL]) required significantly lower injection forces than the BD (1 mL) and ClearJect (0.5 mL) (p < 0.0001).

conclusionWhile all syringes preserved stability of SYFOVRE, injection force increased with higher viscosity. The borosilicate syringe (ClearJect) failed particulate testing, disqualifying it as a viable IVI option. Low-volume ophthalmic-specific syringes (Zero Residual and StaClear) demonstrated superior performance, suggesting they should be used for the safer delivery of intravitreal therapies. Notably, Zero Residual is the only IVI-indicated syringe that eliminates silicone oil–associated risks.

Indexed as

AfliberceptAge-related macular degenerationAnti-VEGFFaricimabHigh viscosity formulationsInjectabilityPegcetacoplanSilicone oilSYFOVRESyringe selection

Identifiers

PMID41821033
PMCPMC13147785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.