Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41821032›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Machine learning-based prediction of high hospital charges after lung transplantation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Qunzhe Ding, Tianyu Sun, Zihao Zhang, Yuhong Liu, Mengli Zheng, Pengtao Bao, Xinxin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qunzhe Ding *School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tianyu Sun *College of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 17 Heishanhu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.
Zihao ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Yuhong LiuCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 17 Heishanhu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.
Mengli ZhengCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 17 Heishanhu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.
Pengtao BaoCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 17 Heishanhu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.
Xinxin ZhangCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 17 Heishanhu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China. zhangxx9128@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung transplantation is an important therapeutic option for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, post-transplantation hospitalizations are associated with substantial cost variation. Accurately predicting high in-hospital expenditures is essential for optimizing clinical management and healthcare resource allocation.

methodsThis study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2005–2014) to identify adult patients who underwent lung transplantation. After rigorous data preprocessing, seven post-discharge or manually coded variables were excluded to prevent potential information leakage. High-cost hospitalizations were defined as those with total hospital charges falling within the top 20% (≥ 80th percentile) of the overall cost distribution. Feature selection was performed using a two-stage process combining correlation analysis and Recursive Feature Elimination. Six machine learning algorithms were trained through ten-fold cross-validation with optimized hyperparameters, and model performance was compared across seven evaluation methods. The optimal model was further interpreted to identify the key features associated with high-cost hospitalizations.

resultsThe Gradient Boosting Machine model achieved the most robust predictive performance across all evaluation metrics, with consistently high accuracy (0.816), F1-score (0.6773), and area under the curve (AUC = 0.8078). To further interpret the model’s decision mechanism, Shapley Additive Explanations analysis was applied to quantify each feature’s contribution to high-cost prediction. The results revealed that hospital region, mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, lung transplant type, and complications of the transplanted lung were the most influential predictors of high-cost hospitalizations. Notably, hospitalizations in the northeast region were associated with the highest predicted costs, indicating substantial regional variation in post-transplant expenditure patterns.

conclusionsThis study developed a transparent machine learning method for predicting high-cost hospitalizations after lung transplantation. The Gradient Boosting Machine model demonstrated optimal predictive performance, and Shapley analysis identified key clinical and regional factors driving hospital expenditures, providing evidence to guide cost management and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Hospital ChargesLung TransplantationMachine LearningPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsUnited StatesChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCost predictionHealthcare expenditureLung transplantationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41821032
PMCPMC13097803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.