ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2026
Trajectories of health-related quality of life after cancer diagnosis in a cohort of Australian women: a longitudinal study.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith increasing cancer survival rates, optimising health-related quality of life (HRQL) has become a major priority. However, longitudinal assessments of HRQL outcomes in people with cancer are limited. This study aimed to examine changes in HRQL outcomes following a cancer diagnosis and to identify the long-term trajectories of HRQL outcomes and associated factors.
methodsThis study included 1414 women diagnosed with primary invasive cancer from 1996 to 2019 and 2828 women without cancer from a large cohort (born in 1946-51) of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, linked to the Australian Cancer Database. Generalised linear models were used to estimate changes in HRQL outcomes, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and other health conditions. Group-based multitrajectory modelling was applied to identify HRQL trajectories over time.
resultsIn the short-term (≤ 3 years), we found a significant decline in the adjusted mean difference (AMD) across all HRQL domains from pre-cancer to post-cancer surveys, with the largest decrease in general health (AMD − 10.3, 95% CI: -11.43, -9.18). The corresponding changes within the same period among women without cancer were not significant at p < 0.05, except for physical functioning. In the long-term (≤ 15 years), four HRQL trajectory groups were identified: very low HRQL trajectory (n = 184, 13%), moderate HRQL trajectory (n = 355, 25%), moderate-high HRQL trajectory (n = 532, 38%), and high HRQL trajectory (n = 343, 24%). In the control sample, a greater proportion of women belonged to the high HRQL trajectory group (29% versus 24%). Cancer survivors in the very low or moderate HRQL trajectory groups had significantly lower HRQL domain scores than the corresponding trajectory groups in the control group (p < 0.05). Compared with the high HRQL trajectory group, the very low HRQL trajectory group experienced greater difficulties in managing their available income (60% versus 22%, p < 0.01) and had ≥ 2 comorbidities (42% versus 9%, p < 0.01).
conclusionsOur findings suggest the importance of measuring HRQL soon after diagnosis as a baseline measure and considering both baseline and ongoing HRQL when guiding supportive care for women cancer survivors. Additionally, targeted initiatives that prevent and manage comorbidities and financial hardship in those with low HRQL at baseline are critical for equitable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.