ArticleBMC oral health2026
The effect of muscle examination findings on determining conservative treatment options for temporomandibular joint disorders.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTemporomandibular joint disorders are common in the community. Identifying the relationship between specific painful examination sites and the choice of conservative treatment methods may have predictive value in determining treatment guidelines. This study aims to investigate the possible effect of pain findings at specific examination sites on determining the selection of clinical decision rules. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were retrospectively analyzed from 1020 patients who presented to a specialty clinic with complaints of pain, movement restrictions, or joint sounds in the temporomandibular joint, temple, and facial regions. Examination findings from 12 palpation sites and administered conservative treatment methods were extracted from diagnostic and treatment records. The binary logistic regression model using a backward stepwise method was constructed to evaluate the contribution of each pain site to each treatment choice. Canonical correlation analysis, based on the optimal scaling approach examined the relationships between two sets of dichotomous variables.
resultsStrong correlation was not found between the distribution of painful palpation sites and the selection of conservative treatments sufficient to establish clinical treatment guidelines. Pain at certain examination sites significantly influenced the cold-hot application, interocclusal splint, and pharmacological treatment recommendations (p < 0.05). The odds of receiving these treatments varied concerning specific pain sites.
conclusionsWhile palpation findings are crucial for diagnosis, they do not reliably guide the selection of conservative treatment methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although essential for diagnosis, palpation-induced pain findings are not predictive in determining treatment methods. Further studies are needed to elucidate evidence-based clinical decision-making mechanisms for temporomandibular joint disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.