ArticleBMC public health2026
Mind the Gap: Exploring Social Inequalities in Alcohol Consumption using Nationally Representative Data from the 2019 and 2021 Health Survey for England.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlcohol-related health inequalities remain a major public health challenge in England, with those from more disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds experiencing the greatest burden of harm despite consuming similar or lower levels of alcohol compared to those from more advantaged backgrounds. Yet, most research in this area has relied on single or composite measures of socioeconomic status (SES) that do not capture the overlapping dimensions of advantage and disadvantage that shape people’s lives and can be difficult for policymakers to interpret. We used a person-centred approach to examine how differing latent SES profiles relate to alcohol consumption before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsWe analysed data from 8,204 adults in 2019 and 5,880 adults in 2021 from the Health Survey for England. A latent class analysis was conducted on seven indicators of SES in 2019 (income, education, occupational grade, housing tenure, benefit receipt, car ownership and employment status), and six in 2021 as occupational grade was not collected that year. Multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity and marital status, examined associations between latent SES classes and four alcohol consumption risk categories (non-drinker, low-risk, increasing-risk and high-risk).
resultsAnalysis revealed five latent classes in 2019 and four in 2021, each representing different constellations of social and economic conditions. Across both years, similar latent classes were identified and drinking patterns across classes were consistent despite the disrupting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to non-drinkers in the Professional/Employed Homeowners class, (Skilled) Low-Income Renters and Retired Homeowners had far lower odds of drinking at all risk levels, while Professional/Employed Private Renters had odds of increasing and high-risk drinking similar to the reference group.
conclusionsThe identification of similar latent SES classes in 2019 and 2021 supports the utility of latent class analysis for capturing the multidimensional nature of SES over time and strengthens the case for future research to employ person-centred approaches when examining the relationship between alcohol consumption and SES. Capturing these constellations of SES indicators through latent class analysis may provide a stronger evidence base for designing targeted interventions and assessing the equity impacts of population-level alcohol control policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.