ReviewCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026
The evolution of cancer therapies and their Implications for health technology assessment in Australia.
Review in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutting edge cancer therapies are increasingly brought to market at high prices, creating a tension between getting new therapies to patients as quickly as possible, and doing so in a cost-effective manner. The earlier cancer therapies are granted market authorisation, the less mature data on efficacy, safety, and quality of life are. The resulting uncertainty can complicate health technology assessments (HTAs) and therefore delay reimbursement decisions, which the vast majority of patients rely on to gain access to expensive new medicines. This narrative review summarises recent innovations in cancer therapies from a health economic perspective in Australia. We describe how such therapies are financed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and the challenges they bring to HTA, such as their increased reliance on surrogate endpoints, extrapolation of immature survival data, and high budget impact. We discuss current methods the field has developed to overcome these problems, including managed entry agreements, coverage with evidence development, early health economic modelling, and the use of real-world evidence. These strategies aim to balance innovation and affordability, ensuring that patients can access life-extending therapies while maintaining the sustainability of Australia’s healthcare system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.