Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820969›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Beyond biometry: the role of fetal venous doppler in discriminating fetal growth restriction from small for gestational age and predicting adverse perinatal outcomes.

Ahmet Arif Filiz, Gülşan Karabay, Betül Tokgöz Çakir, Aziz Kından, Gizem Aktemur, Zeynep Şeyhanlı, Büşra Lekesiz, Dinçer Sümer, Gülşah Dağdeviren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmet Arif FilizDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey. ahmetarif35.filiz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-0270
Gülşan KarabayDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2567-2850
Betül Tokgöz ÇakirDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-4981
Aziz KındanDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8024-204X
Gizem AktemurDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6824-881X
Zeynep ŞeyhanlıDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-3723
Büşra LekesizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7313-243X
Dinçer SümerDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7034-6811
Gülşah DağdevirenDepartment of Perinatology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3426-033X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe distinction between fetal growth restriction (FGR) from small for gestational age (SGA) remains a major clinical challenge due to overlapping biometric features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of fetal arterial and venous Doppler parameters in distinguishing FGR from SGA and in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes.

methodsIn this prospective case-control study conducted at a tertiary referral center, 120 singleton pregnancies between 32 and 39 weeks’ gestation were classified into FGR, SGA, and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. Doppler examinations included the pulsatility index (PI) and the systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio of the umbilical, middle cerebral and uterine arteries as well as the inferior vena cava, pulmonary and hepatic veins. Composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPOs) were also interpreted.

resultsThe pulmonary vein (PV) PI and inferior vena cava (IVC) S/D were significantly higher in the FGR group than in the SGA group (p = 0.033 and p = 0.039, respectively). Cut-off values for FGR prediction were determined in the ROC analysis: PV PI > 1.7 and IVC S/D > 3.29. PV S/D and PV PI were also independently associated with CAPOs (p = 0.006 and p = 0.027, respectively). Univariate analysis confirmed PV S/D and PI as independent predictors of CAPOs.

conclusionFetal venous Doppler parameters, especially PV PI and IVC S/D, enhance the diagnostic discrimination between late onset FGR and SGA and may aid in the early prediction of neonatal complications. These findings suggest their potential role in improving fetal risk prediction beyond standard fetal biometry.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationInfant, Small for Gestational AgeUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultBiometryCase-Control StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHepatic VeinsHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle Cerebral ArteryPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeFetal growth restrictionFetal venous doppler indicesInferior vena cava doppler indicesPulmonary vein doppler indicesSmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID41820969
PMCPMC13093918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.