ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Individual-specific functional connectivity predicts clinical symptoms severity in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant group-level findings on functional connectivity (FC) alterations in patients with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), previous studies have failed to establish reliable neuroimaging biomarkers for diagnosis or symptom prediction. This exploratory study aims to investigate the potential predictive value of resting-state brain network FC at both individual-specific and group levels for clinical symptoms in PTSD patients, and to identify predictive FC biomarkers in specific functional networks.
methods45 PTSD patients diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria (12 males/33 females, aged 28.64 ± 6.87 years) were enrolled. All participants underwent high-resolution T1WI and resting-state functional MRI sequence acquisitions using a 5.0 T MRI system. FC matrices were generated based on both individual-specific parcellation and group-level atlases. A support vector machine for regression model combined with leave-one-out cross-validation was applied to evaluate the predictive performance of FC for the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5 (PCL-5) scores in PTSD patients. Key functional connections identified as predictors of symptom severity were analyzed, and each individual-specific subregion was classified based on its membership within one of seven major brain networks. The large-scale brain network properties significant for predicting PTSD symptoms were further explored.
resultsFunctional connectivity derived from individual-specific parcellation significantly predicted PCL-5 scores in PTSD patients (r = 0.5275, p = 0.0010), whereas the association at the group-level was significantly reduced (r = -0.0360, p = 0.3710). Further analysis revealed that the key predictive functional connections primarily involved between-network connectivity and with dorsal attention network (DAN) contributed most significantly to the prediction of symptom severity. Interestingly, FC between networks was overall positively correlated with higher PCL scores (r = 0.5265, p = 0.0002).
conclusionsIndividual-specific FC analysis demonstrated preliminary evidence of higher accuracy and relevance in predicting clinical symptoms of PTSD, with DAN contributing most significantly to the prediction. The predictive effect was primarily linked to bidirectional alterations in between-network connectivity, with a net positive correlation observed on average. These findings provide evidence for the utility of using individualized brain region homologies in predicting symptom severity within PTSD. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.