Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820951›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Natural language processing for geriatric syndromes: a systematic review of methods, applications, and challenges.

Fahrurrozi Rahman, Imane Guellil, Abul Hasan, Huayu Zhang, Matúš Falis, Arlene Casey, Honghan Wu, Bruce Guthrie, Beatrice Alex

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fahrurrozi RahmanAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. frahman@ed.ac.uk.
Imane GuellilAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Abul HasanInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Huayu ZhangLifeArc, London, UK.
Matúš FalisUsher Institute, School of Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Arlene CaseyAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Honghan WuInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Bruce GuthrieAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Beatrice AlexAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust Mental Health Award NIHR202639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric syndromes (GS) are complex conditions that affect older adults and often require multidisciplinary assessment. Natural language processing (NLP) has emerged as a promising tool for extracting relevant clinical information from unstructured text in electronic health records (EHRs). However, the application of NLP in detecting and monitoring GS remains an evolving area of research. This systematic review explores the role of NLP in the identification and analysis of GS, examining its applications, methodologies, and effectiveness. Furthermore, this review discusses the existing challenges, limitations, and future directions to advance NLP applications in the GS research.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search across ten databases to identify studies that applied NLP to GS detection. Articles were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and relevant studies were evaluated for quality using PROBAST. Data were extracted on study characteristics, datasets, annotation processes, NLP approaches, performance metrics, population demographics, and clinical applications. A PRISMA flow diagram was used to illustrate the study selection process.

resultsA total of 65 studies were included, where the majority of the studies used traditional rule-based and machine learning approaches. Publicly available datasets were scarce, and most studies used their private dataset, leading to significant variability in data sources and formats. Annotation methodologies differed across studies, with minimal shared guidelines or standards, making direct comparisons challenging. Performance metrics varied across syndromes, with F1-score, precision, and recall as the most commonly reported. Key challenges included the lack of dataset uniformity, differences in annotation practices, and the absence of external validation.

conclusionNLP has shown potential in GS analysis, particularly for the detection of syndromes and epidemiological research. However, the majority of studies only focused on one syndrome, and variability in dataset availability, annotation processes, and model performance present challenges to broader implementation. Future research should focus on improving the comprehensiveness of GS identification, dataset standardisation, enhancing model generalisability, and integrating NLP approaches into clinical workflows.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGeriatricsNatural Language ProcessingAgedHumansSyndromeGeriatric syndromesNatural language processingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41820951
PMCPMC13097797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.