ArticleBMC medical education2026
Integrating indigenous methodologies into medical education in the west: a conceptual framework for the Hybrid Relational Clerkship Model (HRCM).
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite growing attention to equity and cultural safety in medical education, Indigenous methodologies remain largely absent from the core structure of clinical training in Canada and America. Current clerkship models are short-term and transactional, emphasizing biomedical exposure rather than sustained relational learning. This disconnect perpetuates inequities and mistrust between Indigenous communities and healthcare institutions. To address this gap, this paper proposes a Hybrid Relational Clerkship Model (HRCM) that integrates Indigenous methodologies—particularly relationality, reciprocity, and land-based learning—within longitudinal clerkship structures.
methodsUsing a qualitative, interpretive, and literature-based approach, this conceptual study resulted from a narrative review of academic and institutional sources from ten Canadian and U.S. medical schools to analyze how Indigenous and community-based learning are currently represented in clerkship design. Indigenous-authored literature, frameworks such as Two-Eyed Seeing (Etuaptmumk), and principles of the Four R’s (Respect, Responsibility, Relevance, Reciprocity)—guided the analysis. Findings from Indigenous and Western medical education scholarship were synthesized to develop the HRCM as a conceptual framework for curriculum redesign.
resultsThe review identified a persistent reliance on short-term rural placements that meet accreditation standards but do not foster relational continuity or accountability to Indigenous communities. One Canadian Medical institution demonstrated a longitudinal, community-embedded Indigenous clerkship model -. The proposed HRCM reframes clerkship as an 8–12-month placement emphasizing dual mentorship (Indigenous and biomedical), community co-governance, and Two-Eyed Seeing–based assessment. The model aligns with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action 22–24 -, the CACMS Standard 9.5 on narrative assessment, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 10 (Reduced Inequalities).
conclusionsThe HRCM provides a conceptual framework for integrating Indigenous knowledge systems as core pedagogical foundations in medical education, moving beyond cultural awareness toward structural reconciliation. By embedding relationality, reciprocity, and community-led assessment into clerkship design, this model supports the development of physicians who are both clinically competent and culturally accountable. Implementing this framework may enhance trust, continuity, and health outcomes in Indigenous communities while contributing to a more equitable and inclusive medical education system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.