Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820918›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2026

Trauma-informed procedural training in emergency medicine: a multi-site randomized control pilot study.

Taylor Brown, Henry Ashista, Gabriel Sudario, Michael Clery, Nicole M Dubosh, Aaron Harries, Nana Yaa Misa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Taylor BrownDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. tbrown24@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Henry AshistaHikma Health, San Jose, CA, USA.
Gabriel SudarioDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Oakland, CA, USA.
Michael CleryDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nicole M DuboshDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Aaron HarriesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nana Yaa MisaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Oakland, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrauma-informed care (TIC) is increasingly recognized as an essential component of emergency medicine. Emergency departments frequently care for individuals with a history of trauma, and standard emergency care may inadvertently trigger distress or re-traumatization. Procedures, which often involve discomfort, may be particularly activating. Despite this relevance, TIC training is rarely embedded into procedural education. This study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of a pilot trauma-informed procedural skills curriculum for senior medical students.

methodsA pilot, multi-center randomized controlled trial was implemented among senior medical students completing an elective emergency medicine rotation. Participants were randomized to either receive a TIC-focused didactic and case-based curriculum prior to simulation (intervention group) or after simulation (control group). All learners completed pre- and post-training surveys assessing familiarity with TIC principles, knowledge, and attitudes. Performance during a standardized patient simulation was evaluated using a clinical skills checklist measuring TIC procedural behaviors. Statistical analysis included paired and independent non-parametric tests.

resultsBaseline familiarity with TIC was low, with only 9% (3/35) reporting being “very” familiar with TIC principles prior to the session. Following training, 70% (23/33) reported being “very” or “extremely” familiar (p < 0.0001). Learners demonstrated significant improvements in comfort performing procedures on patients with a trauma history and guiding grounding techniques. The intervention group outperformed the control group on the procedural checklist (67% vs. 44% mean completion; p = 0.0036), with no difference in time to scenario completion (10.58 vs. 10.68 min, p = 0.8348). Attitudes reflecting the importance of TIC were strongly endorsed at baseline and did not change significantly.

conclusionsThis pilot randomized control trial demonstrates that trauma-informed procedural training is both feasible to implement within existing emergency medicine curricula and effective in enhancing learner performance. Integration of TIC principles into procedural instruction may enhance clinical competency while maintaining efficiency in emergency care settings. Larger studies are needed to assess long-term retention and translation into clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEmergency MedicineWounds and InjuriesCurriculumFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsMedical educationProcedural teachingTrauma-informed careTrauma-informed medical education

Identifiers

PMID41820918
PMCPMC13093982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.