Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2026
Trauma-informed procedural training in emergency medicine: a multi-site randomized control pilot study.
Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrauma-informed care (TIC) is increasingly recognized as an essential component of emergency medicine. Emergency departments frequently care for individuals with a history of trauma, and standard emergency care may inadvertently trigger distress or re-traumatization. Procedures, which often involve discomfort, may be particularly activating. Despite this relevance, TIC training is rarely embedded into procedural education. This study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of a pilot trauma-informed procedural skills curriculum for senior medical students.
methodsA pilot, multi-center randomized controlled trial was implemented among senior medical students completing an elective emergency medicine rotation. Participants were randomized to either receive a TIC-focused didactic and case-based curriculum prior to simulation (intervention group) or after simulation (control group). All learners completed pre- and post-training surveys assessing familiarity with TIC principles, knowledge, and attitudes. Performance during a standardized patient simulation was evaluated using a clinical skills checklist measuring TIC procedural behaviors. Statistical analysis included paired and independent non-parametric tests.
resultsBaseline familiarity with TIC was low, with only 9% (3/35) reporting being “very” familiar with TIC principles prior to the session. Following training, 70% (23/33) reported being “very” or “extremely” familiar (p < 0.0001). Learners demonstrated significant improvements in comfort performing procedures on patients with a trauma history and guiding grounding techniques. The intervention group outperformed the control group on the procedural checklist (67% vs. 44% mean completion; p = 0.0036), with no difference in time to scenario completion (10.58 vs. 10.68 min, p = 0.8348). Attitudes reflecting the importance of TIC were strongly endorsed at baseline and did not change significantly.
conclusionsThis pilot randomized control trial demonstrates that trauma-informed procedural training is both feasible to implement within existing emergency medicine curricula and effective in enhancing learner performance. Integration of TIC principles into procedural instruction may enhance clinical competency while maintaining efficiency in emergency care settings. Larger studies are needed to assess long-term retention and translation into clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.