Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820916›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Loneliness in older adults: an assessment on social network usage, social support, and active aging.

Mükerrem Kabataş Yıldız, Ayşe Çal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mükerrem Kabataş YıldızDepartment of Health Care Services, Vocational School of Health Services, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7598-162X
Ayşe ÇalDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Türkiye. ayse.cal@ankaramedipol.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-156X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to examine the relationship between social network usage, active aging, perceived social support, and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above who live in a city center in Türkiye and use social networks.

methodsThe data for this descriptive study were collected between November 2022 and May 2023. The sample consisted of 319 individuals aged 60 in Türkiye. Data were gathered through face-to-face interviews using the Demographic Information Form, Loneliness Scale for the Elderly, Scale for the Social Network Usage Purposes of Older Adults, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and Active Aging Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data.

resultsThe perception of loneliness in older adults was 7.85 ± 4.94; the mean score for active aging-activity dimension was 33.65 ± 12.56; social network usage was 75.46 ± 20.03, and the perceived social support was 24.06 ± 4.42. A moderate relationship was found between loneliness in old age and perceived social support (r=-0.501), and a weak negative relationship was found between loneliness in old age and the active aging-activity dimension (r = 0.155). Additionally, the communication and collaboration sub-dimensions of social network usage were found to be associated with loneliness. Social support and social network usage predict loneliness (26%). Social support and social network usage explain 50% and 11% of the variance in loneliness, respectively.

conclusionsPerceived social support and social network usage play a determinant role in the perception of loneliness in older adults.

Indexed as

AgingHealthy AgingLonelinessSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedActive agingLonelinessOld ageSocial network usageSocial support

Identifiers

PMID41820916
PMCPMC13045080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.