ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Understanding smart health and elderly care implementation in China: a qualitative TOE-C framework analysis of 24 cases.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid population aging and digital transformation are accelerating the global proliferation of smart health and elderly care (SHEC) systems. In China, national policies have actively promoted SHEC as a strategic pathway toward achieving age-friendly cities and communities (AFCC). Yet, the practical mechanisms by which SHEC initiatives translate policy goals into inclusive, community-based care are insufficiently explored. Existing studies predominantly examine either technological or organizational dimensions in isolation, paying limited attention to the role of user capability and its interaction with institutional arrangements.
methodsThis study adopts a qualitative multiple-case research design to examine the implementation mechanisms of SHEC in China. Drawing on 24 nationally recognized demonstration cases, we conducted a framework-based qualitative analysis using an extended Technology–Organization–Environment–Capability (TOE-C) framework. Case materials were systematically coded and analyzed to identify patterns of interaction among technological infrastructures, organizational arrangements, policy environments, and user capabilities.
resultsThe findings indicate that effective SHEC operate as a complex socio-technical system, dynamically shaped by the interplay of technology, organization, environment, and capability. While technological infrastructures facilitate data integration and service delivery, user capability emerges as a critical mediating factor, determining whether such systems achieve meaningful and sustainable service outcomes aligned with AFCC goals. Organizational coordination, policy support, and capability-building mechanisms collectively shape service accessibility, adaptability, and continuity. The results further reveal that capability is not merely an individual trait but a structurally embedded element shaped by governance arrangements, service design, and institutional support, which are essential for realizing inclusive digital health.
conclusionsThis study advances existing research by extending the traditional TOE framework to incorporate capability as a core analytical dimension. The proposed TOE-C framework provides a more comprehensive explanation of how SHEC systems function in practice, particularly in contexts characterized by population aging and digital inequality. By highlighting the structural role of capability in mediating technological and organizational interventions, this study offers both theoretical contributions and practical insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking to develop inclusive, sustainable, and people-centered smart elderly care systems that effectively support the goals of AFCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.