ArticleBMC public health2026
Urban-rural disparities in menarcheal timing: a longitudinal cohort study examining social determinants of health (SDOH), screen time, and hormonal influences among adolescent girls in West Bengal, India.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the association between early menarche, lifestyle factors, screen time (TV and mobile phones) and psychological factors among girls aged 8–10 years living in West Bengal, India, with special emphasis on hormonal and psychosocial influences and an urban-rural perspective using the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) framework.
methodA mixed-methods cohort study of 1,200 girls (600 urban, 600 rural) was followed up over three years. Quantitative (hormone assays, anthropometrics) and qualitative (body image, screen use interviews) approaches were used to measure screen time, physical activity, sleep, diet, hormone levels (melatonin, cortisol, GnRH, LH, FSH, estradiol, leptin), anthropometrics (BMI, Tanner staging), and psychological outcomes (stress, anxiety, self-perception).
resultsUrban girls with > 4 h/day of screen time had ≈ 4.2 months earlier menarche onset than rural girls with < 2 h/day. In urban girls, early menarche was linked to increased cortisol, decreased melatonin, and increased estradiol, associated with greater sedentary activity and stress from social media. Rural girls exhibited resilience amid family stress. Urban girls had body image issues; rural girls used screens as a means of escape. Excessive screen time, hormonal interference, and growth accelerators, from increasingly worse urban diets to the exacerbation of inactivity and presenteeism, help explain the acceleration, which affects urban girls especially, given the activity-inactivity model & the potential for online bullying associated with a reliance on social media. Qualitative data elucidate the protective resilience of rural girls, constructing urban body dissatisfaction, rural escape mobility, and environmental contexts.
conclusionOur findings concluded that screen exposure accelerates menarche through psychobiological mechanisms, especially significant in urban-rural differences. To mitigate screen time effects and protect girls’ health across settings, context-specific interventions are critical. The SDOH framework highlighted how structural factors-like digital access, education stress, and community dynamics-shape puberty in meaningful ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.